Biology Department
Westfield State College

Facial Asymmetry Experiments

In an attempt to understand the underlying developmental causes of facial asymmetry, the spring 1998 Comparative Anatomy class collected data from volunteers ranging in age from 18 to 61. We used a ruler to measure the distance between the center of the bridge of the nose and the center of the pupil and between the center of the bridge of the nose and the lateral edge of the orbit. The data are presented below.



Table 1. Distance between the birdge of the nose and the left pupil (Lpupil), bridge of the nose and right pupil (Rpupil), bridge of the nose and left orbit (Lorbit), and bridge of the nose and right orbit (Rorbit). Key: Sex, 1=male and 2=female; Sightedenes, 1=normal, 2=near, 3=far, 4=astigmatism, and 5=other; Eye Dominance, 1=right, 2=left.

Participant
Number
SexAgeSightednessHandedness Eye
Dominance
Lpupil
(mm)
Rpupil
(mm)
Lorbit
(mm)
Rorbit
(mm)

3129801158221 37375657
3129802159411 35355756
3129803152222 32304846
3129804247311 34315049
3129805221212 27294950
3129806261412 37355755
3129807133122 35355856
3129808235212 32305456
3129811218212 31295050
3129812136221 35355560
3129813120111 30344849
3129814119111 33335454
3129815221511 32315352
3129816219212 29284647
3129817121111 33.536.55554
3129818120211 31325151
3129819119211 30.533.549.551.5
3129820121212 32315754
3129821125112 3734.55354
3129822220212 28265052
3129823124111 31345455
3129824143411 33.230.151.848.8
3129825221211 29.5294846
3129826145113 35355655
3129827218111 35355555
3129828242411 33315352
3129829234411 34345655
3129830119111 29305049
3129831118112 3234.55052.1
3129832219211 30.53250.251
3129833239112 323455.555
3129834231211 35345052




The above data table is also available as a comma delimited text file or as a downloadable MS Excel xls file.



The above data were analyzed through use of JMP Statistical Discovery Software from SAS. A two-tailed t-test revealed that the average difference between the right pupil and the center of the bridge of the nose and the left pupil and the center of the bridge of the nose in this sample was not significantly different from zero (t-statistic = -0.193, p = 0.848 for a two-tailed test, N = 32). There were also no significant differences when the right and left orbit distances were compared (t-statistic=-0.061, p=0.952). A regression analysis using age as the dependent variable and the difference between right and left orbit distances showed no significant trend. However, Figure 1 demonstrates a significant negative relationship between age and right-left pupil difference (right-left pupil = 1.638 - 0.035 Age, R Squared=0.159, ANOVA F Ratio = 5.68, P > F = 0.024, N = 32).

Figure 1. Relationship between age and difference between right pupil distance and left pupil distance and confidence intervals.


A t-test of the average right-left pupil difference among 18-29 year-olds revealed no significant difference from zero (t-statistic = 1.294, p = 0.213, N = 18). However, the left pupil distance was significantly greater than the right pupil distance in those individuals 30 years and older (t-statistic = -2.414, p = 0.03, N = 14).

Contingency table analysis revealed no significant relationship between handedness and eye dominace (X2 = 0.121, p = 0.73, N = 31), nor between handedness and right-left orbit distance difference (X2 = 0.164, p = 0.685, N = 32). However, a significant positive relationship was observed between handedness and right-left pupil distance difference (X2 = 3.251, p = 0.07, N = 32).



Last updated 4/4/00

  Return to the Biology Department Home Page